Tzogopoulos writes in Global Times on China’s new international role

Global TimesWhile emphasis is naturally placed on the bilateral dimension of Sino-American relations following the meeting between presidents Xi Jinping and Barack Obama, there in another issue that deserves attention. This is China’s new international role and how it could affect developments at the world stage. As the world is becoming multilateral or ‘apolar’ according to several politicians and scholars, the room for more compromises, partnerships and collective diplomatic initiatives is big enough. Beijing can contribute towards this direction and has already started to do so.

Not surprisingly, the new international role of rising China is regarded in a suspicious way in the West. The country is often not trusted while its policies are largely considered as tools used by its administration to serve political and foreign policy goals. The ‘One Belt One Road’, for instance, is regarded as an opportunity for it to find more allies in the Eurasia region and expand its global influence. Further to this, even China’s large contribution to UN peacekeeping operations is associated with alleged interests in the countries and areas where these operations are taking place.

Criticism goes hand in hand with the general Western interpretation of China and its perceived motivations. But this criticism fails to acknowledge the new reality that the US has to work with China – either bilaterally or multilaterally – to address international challenges. US National Security Advisor Ambassador Susan Rice shares this view by explicitly saying that ‘when China and the US work together, the world is more secure and more prosperous’.

There is no better example to highlight China’s new international role than the fight against terrorism and the Islamic State. The country is highly concerned about this threat being encountered with attacks on its own soil, in Xinjiang. In that regard, Beijing is theoretically supportive of the US-coalition activities against the Islamic State, although it might easier join military operations under a UN banner. The interest of China in fighting against terror and protecting Xinjiang goes beyond the need to take security measures to that of working towards political stability. The country is much closer to the main basis of the Islamic State in comparison to the US and the EU and is more and could be directly threatened. This said, Beijing is highly interested in facilitating – if not in mediating – to increase chances for peace settlements in countries such as Syria.

Moreover, China’s diplomacy also has a significant impact on efforts of the international community to reach other critical agreements. The breakthrough in Iran’s nuclear program – for which the country deserves a credit – had seemed almost unthinkable a few years ago. Optimistic thinkers believe that this could set an exemplary case for international negotiations on the nuclear program of North Korea.

Apart from international affairs, Beijing’s promising contribution to world growth should not be ignored. The establishment of the Asia Infrastructure and Investment Bank – where several European countries such as Britain, France and Germany participate – constitutes a new instrument that might finance infrastructure and development works. Although the US has not welcomed this initiative, the usage of the new financial mechanism will be a reference point from next year onwards.

The new international role of China cannot generate optimism that antagonism with the US on various fronts will be eliminated. It creates hope though that the existing bilateral differences will be managed and subsequently world challenges will be addressed efficiently. It is not only China and the US which will benefit by an enhanced co-operation but also the entire planet expecting from these two countries to offer together tangible solutions to problems.

All in all, history can show the way. China and the US co-operated against the ‘Axis’ in WWI . They also refrained from real confrontation during the Cold War before the historical visit of Richard Nixon to Beijing in 1972 and the beginning of rapprochement. Some decades later, a new chapter opens. This time with China leading and not following.

This article was first published in Global Times.